Hgh. Anti Aging Garbage Or Civilization’s Salvation?


by Scott Schofield

There have been quite a few clinical studies of HGH in recent years, mainly of injectable HGH, and some of the results have been very exciting.

The results of those studies have been interpreted by some manufacturers to claim that HGH can effectively roll back the years and defeat the aging process. The positive benefits now widely attributed to the use of HGH include:

Enhanced Memory

Improvement in skin texture and firmness

Reduced SkinWrinkles

Reduction of Body-Fat comined with Muscle-gain

Improved sleep

Enhanced Energy Levels

Reduction ofAches and Pains

Increased Libido and enhanced Sexual Performance

As a result many manufacturing and marketing companies have been created to take advantage of the new “Human Growth Hormone” market that almost immediately sprang up.

The measurable and statistically sound results were seized upon by the new HGH manufacturers. Their key selling point was that their product could roll back the years and defeat the effects of aging. Sadly, a proportion of them have produced products containing no evidence of efficacy or no independent clinical evidence that their product actually worked.

As a result, there are now a few HGH products available which contain (a) the correct ingredients, but in such small quantities that they will have no effect, or (b) entirely the wrong ingredients, or (c) the right ingredients but in the wrong proportions. All are said to offer little or no potency.

Homeopathic Confusion I have seen numerous articles on the net claiming that HGH manufacturers are crooks because they are selling Homeopathic HGH in such low concentrations that it is absolutely impossible for it to work. These writers are totally ignoring the fact that homeopathic practitioners claim (an users believe) that the lower the apparent dosage, the higher the potency of the product!

Actually, I have heard precisely the same criticisms used to target manufacturers of other products over the last thirty years, long before HGH was commercially available.

Homeopathy is not illegal, and many avid users of homeopathic products are leading figures in our society, and they are not given to wild flights of fancy where their health is concerned.

Many members of my own royal family (I am English) are keen supporters of homeopathic medicine, even though they also have the most knowledgeable and expensive doctors to look after them too.

The argument thirty years ago was exactly the same as it is today -that it is just impossible for Homeopathic HGH to work. Article writers imply that the Human Growth Hormone concentrations are impossibly low, so low that it is almost certain that there is not a single molecule of the product in any particular dose.

The problem for me is, my scientific brain tells me they are right, it can’t work!

But my logical brain knows that millions of intelligent and articulate people use homeopathic products, often for many years. Why would anyone continue to use a product that clearly didn’t work when there is usually another product available that will? Are they all crazy except for me?

“Ahah!” I hear you say. “It will only work because you want it to work, it’s all in the mind” Well I’ve heard that one as well, but I’ve also heard of horses and dogs being treated with homeopathic remedies - and responding to their treatments. I can’t believe that someone has managed to convince a dog that she’ll feel better just by drinking some homeopathic water!

I’ll return to HGH. I have a Human Growth Hormone web site containing lots of free information and a few HGH product recommendations too. But I am now selecting what I recommend on my web site using a much wider range of criteria than those used elsewhere.

My parameters include the numbers being sold (particularly re-orders by existing HGH product users), and feedback from satisfied and dissatisfied purchasers. I also take into account HGH product testimonials on manufacturers’ web sites (they’re suspect, I know), and also the very high volume of comment on the web in forums, social sites etc I only take into account unbiased and reasoned comment. I also use the supplier’s quality of service - like quick deliveries, rapid response to enquiries, warranties and so on.

That last one is so important. Why is it so wrong to treat adults like adults like adults and give them the opportunity to make up their own minds. If they buy a product with a “money back if not satisfied” guarantee, so that they can protect themselves from disappointment or failure, what right have others to make their minds up for them!

Whoops, I’m in danger of drifting into another debate here, that of the big pharmaceuticals who dominate government policy and unfairly influence decisions which (accidentally of course) damage or destroy their competition - the small independent nutritional supplement and alternative medicine manufacturers and distributors. I’ll save that rant for another article (after I’ve engaged a top lawyer)!

About the Author:

Popularity: 12% [?]

Leave a Reply